Dec. 1, 2003
Staggering toward '04
By ERIC J. PLOSKY
December already -- Election Day 2004 is a bare eleven months away. And what have we got?
President Bush swooping down on Baghdad, turkey for the troops -- pure re-election photo-op stuff.
On the Democratic side, what Barbara Bush called, I think, a "sorry bunch." Sigh.
On the issues?
Al Gore's populism didn't carry the day in 2000 because voters aren't populists. Saturated
by advertising and "entertainment" that brutally pushes the dream of the upper middle class,
people don't want to hear that the rich should be soaked, since everyone these days believes
that one day -- soon -- he'll be rich.
Without populism, the Democrats are scrambling for a new message, a new base, a new everything.
The long-dead New Deal coalition -- finished off by the one-two punch of Nixon (1968) and Reagan
(1980) -- is a distant, impossible memory.
The nine Democratic candidates therefore have their work cut out for them.
Howard Dean is at the top of the Democratic heap mostly because his early identity, crafted around
opposition to the Iraq war, was clear and strong enough for primary activists to understand. It
helps that Dean has a forceful, no-nonsense personality and has been unafraid to sail into the
Bush administration. As time goes on, though, Dean's populist soundings -- repeal the Bush tax
cut! -- will land him into the familiar old Democratic quicksand. Now that he's the one to watch,
Dean should look to broaden his appeal to the great seething mass that will probably go for W.,
the Great Protector. He's already started veering to the center, announcing that he'll be
targeting Confederate flag-wavers.
One Democrat who's started in the middle is Wesley Clark, latterly some sort of admiral-general.
Perhaps thinking that the many stars on his shoulders make him invulnerable to the weak-sister taunting
directed at Dean (who was busy skiing on a supposedly bad back during Vietnam), Clark has positioned
himself as a modern Eisenhower, a neither-fish-nor-fowl pseudo-politician who can bring order to
perilous times. Clark's inexperience, however, is a problem -- so is his late entry to the race, and so,
as recently reported in the New Yorker, is the opposition of many Clinton-era Pentagon types.
Clark, it seems, has been angling for this job since West Point. Too much ambition?
Speaking of the ambitious military-but-not, there's also John Kerry, who as a war
hero-turned-protestor perhaps partly inspired Forrest Gump. His other credentials -- lieutenant
governor of Massachusetts, long-serving senator -- are sufficient. Unfortunately, Kerry hasn't
connected with an audience, and his campaign is in turmoil. As the once-leading candidate of the
Democratic establishment, he can't yet be counted out. The trouble is not only that Kerry can't
be everything to everybody (or to enough people) -- it's that he hasn't even really been something
Dick Gephardt might once have been counted near the top, but Dean has nicked many of the important
union endorsements that Gephardt figured would be his lifeblood. The unions, for their part, figure
to back the front-runner, which makes sense, but that leaves Gephardt on perilous ground, pushing
expensive, old-line Democratic policies that can't win. Not to say that they shouldn't; everyone
would be better off with Gephardt's health-insurance plan than with Bush's. For some reason, though,
selling health insurance is harder than selling "not-health insurance," even as the ranks of the
uninsured swell. That may play well in Des Moines, Dick, but what after Iowa?
Ah, to have Clinton again. John Edwards apparently thought that he'd be the next best thing:
coiffed hair, Southern accent, under 50. But this is a crowded field, and Edwards doesn't have
Clintonian charm to carry him above the pack.
Remember Joe Lieberman? Neither do I.
Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton -- these men are, respectively, the Far Left-Winger and the
Black Candidate. I wonder how much longer America will have to go before we can have a candidate
who simply happens to be black (we came close in 1996, when Colin Powell thought about it).
The Far Left-Winger, though, will probably be with us a long time, and this time it's Kucinich.
He's there to yell at and generally embarrass the credible candidates, and has done probably about
as well as can be expected, considering that the leader, Dean, isn't the type to get tongue-tied.
Sharpton has provided some comic relief but little in the way of statesmanship. Dancing on stage
with James Brown is a plus in my book, but it makes an entertainer, not a president.
And then there's Carol Moseley Braun, who could be the most interesting candidate in the race, if
only because it is entirely unclear why she is running; all of the traditional candidate-roles
have been taken. Actually, the Eccentric slot has opened up (Bob Graham, who compulsively records every single
minute detail of his life in little journals, quit the race), but Moseley Braun, to strike out in
that direction, would have to yodel or strip or something, and she has shown no such inclinations.
What to watch for
Primary season gets underway soon soon soon, which means that coverage will be increasing, which
means that even the teeny-tiny will be magnified to Jovian proportions. The fringe will be
trimmed, the possibles will push generally left, and Bush will seek to distract attention by doing
lots of "presidential" things, such as signing bills that mention Medicare and other Democratic words.
Watch this space for further trenchant analysis as the season staggers on.
Send a comment
To subscribe, send an e-mail to
You will be notified when a new article is posted to the site. Your e-mail address will not be
sold to or shared with anyone for any reason.
Subjectverb is written and published by Eric J. Plosky.
He has an extensive background in writing and journalism and is a media veteran,
appearing in People, The Economist, The Chronicle of Higher Education,
the Boston Globe, Boston Herald, and Boston Phoenix,
and on National Public Radio. At MIT he won the
1998 Writing Prize and wrote for The Tech;
his first play was produced in 2002 in New York. Eric
hosts Free Transfer, a live,
weekly news and variety television program in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, where he lives. He also works in Cambridge, for the U.S. Department of
Transportation's Volpe Center.
Send comments regarding articles to email@example.com.
For all other matters, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.
All content presented is the sole responsibility of the attributed author; any opinions
represented are those of the author. All content copyright Subjectverb. All rights reserved.